Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

A new species of Xenoturbella from the western Pacific Ocean and the evolution of Xenoturbella

  • Hiroaki Nakano1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Hideyuki Miyazawa1,
  • Akiteru Maeno2,
  • Toshihiko Shiroishi2,
  • Keiichi Kakui3,
  • Ryo Koyanagi4,
  • Miyuki Kanda4,
  • Noriyuki Satoh5,
  • Akihito Omori6, 7 and
  • Hisanori Kohtsuka6
BMC Evolutionary BiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:245

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-1080-2

Received: 7 June 2017

Accepted: 16 November 2017

Published: 18 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Xenoturbella is a group of marine benthic animals lacking an anus and a centralized nervous system. Molecular phylogenetic analyses group the animal together with the Acoelomorpha, forming the Xenacoelomorpha. This group has been suggested to be either a sister group to the Nephrozoa or a deuterostome, and therefore it may provide important insights into origins of bilaterian traits such as an anus, the nephron, feeding larvae and centralized nervous systems. However, only five Xenoturbella species have been reported and the evolutionary history of xenoturbellids and Xenacoelomorpha remains obscure.

Results

Here we describe a new Xenoturbella species from the western Pacific Ocean, and report a new xenoturbellid structure - the frontal pore. Non-destructive microCT was used to investigate the internal morphology of this soft-bodied animal. This revealed the presence of a frontal pore that is continuous with the ventral glandular network and which exhibits similarities with the frontal organ in acoelomorphs.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that large size, oval mouth, frontal pore and ventral glandular network may be ancestral features for Xenoturbella. Further studies will clarify the evolutionary relationship of the frontal pore and ventral glandular network of xenoturbellids and the acoelomorph frontal organ. One of the habitats of the newly identified species is easily accessible from a marine station and so this species promises to be valuable for research on bilaterian and deuterostome evolution.

Keywords

Xenoturbella AcoelsNemertodermatidsAcoelomorphaXenacoelomorphaFrontal organDeuterostomesBilateriansMetazoansEvolution

Background

Xenoturbella is a group of marine benthic worms, first described in 1949 as a ‘strange’ platyhelminth [1]. It has a mouth but lacks an anus, hence the digestive organ is a sack rather than a tube. The nervous system of Xenoturbella is not centralized and is in the form of an intraepidermal nerve net [13]. Structures such as a coelom and reproductive organs are absent [1]. Various phylogenetic positions have been suggested for this animal based on different morphological characters - an early metazoan group based on its overall body plan [4], the sister group to Bilateria based on its nervous system structure [2] and musculature [5], a member of the deuterostomes based on epidermal structure [6, 7] and a bivalve based on oocyte characteristics [8] (discussed in [911]). Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses support a close affinity with the Acoelomorpha [1214], a group of marine worms also originally suggested to belong to the Platyhelminthes, but later suggested to be the sister group to the Nephrozoa (all remaining Bilateria) [1521]. Xenoturbella and Acoelomorpha are suggested to form a new clade, the Xenacoelomorpha, and accordingly similarities in overall body plan [1], morphology of the free-swimming stage during development [2224], ciliary ultrastructure [2527] and degenerating epidermal cells [28] have been reported. However, diversity within the Xenacoelomorpha has been reported for some other features, such as the morphology of the digestive organ [1], statocyst [29, 30], sperm [3133] and cleavage pattern [11, 3436]. When a monophyletic clade consisting of Xenoturbella and Acoelomorpha was first proposed based on large scale molecular phylogenetic analyses, it was suggested to be a sister group to the Nephrozoa [12]. A later study, in which the name Xenacoelomorpha was first introduced, proposed that the group is a member of the deuterostomes [13]. However, a more recent study has again suggested a sister group relationship to the Nephrozoa [14]. Either way, it is clear that studies on Xenoturbella could provide important insights into the origins of bilaterian traits such as an anus, the nephron, feeding larvae and centralized nervous systems [24, 3743].

The type species for Xenoturbella, X. bocki, is about 1–3 cm in body length and inhabits the seafloor of western Sweden coast at 50–200 m depth [1, 9, 11]. There is a considerable body of research on this species, and almost all knowledge of Xenoturbella comes from this animal. A second species, X. westbladi, was reported from the same habitat as X. bocki in 1999 [44], but a recent haplotype network analysis using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) sequences showed that X. bocki and X. westbladi are a single species and that X. westbladi should be regarded as a junior synonym for the species [45]. Xenoturbellids were then reported from the Pacific Ocean when four species (X. monstrosa, X. churro, X. profunda and X. hollandorum) were reported from the west coast of USA and Mexico in 2016 [45]. This discovery revealed unknown diversity within the group: the body lengths of three of the species were over 10 cm, with X. monstrosa reaching about 20 cm; a structure called the ventral glandular network was described; and two sub-clades termed ‘shallow’ and ‘deep’ were identified. These four species all live on the sea floor at over 600 m deep, with some as deep as 3700 m, and require remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) equipped with a slurp gun for collection, making them difficult to work on as research organisms. Here we report the discovery of a new species of Xenoturbella off the Japanese coast and discuss the ancestral traits of Xenoturbella and Xenacoelomorpha. The new species can be collected using a marine biological dredge within an hour from a marine station, and therefore it promises to be a valuable model for further research on xenacoelomorphs.

Results

Xenoturbellida Bourlat et al., 2006 [46]

Genus Xenoturbella Westblad, 1949 [1]

Xenoturbella japonica sp. nov.

Etymology. Named for the locality where the specimens were collected.

Material examined. Holotype: NSMT-Xe 2, female (Figs. 1, 3, Additional file 1: Video S1 and Additional file 2: Video S2). Paratype: NSMT-Xe 1, juvenile, sex unknown (Figs. 2, 3, Additional file 1: Video S1 and Additional file 3: Video S3).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Morphology of the holotype specimen (female) of Xenoturbella japonica sp. nov. a Live specimen with anterior to the left. b Antero-ventral part of a relaxed specimen, composed from two separate photographs. c Mid-ventral part of a relaxed specimen. The ventral glandular network ends at the ring furrow. d Volume rendering image from microCT scans showing the difference in epidermal composition between the anterior and posterior parts of the animal. e MicroCT scan showing a transverse section just anterior to the mouth. The epidermis (ep), intraepidermal nerve net (nn), basal lamina (bl) and muscle layer (ml) surround the intestine (int). f Volume rendering image from microCT scans showing oocytes inside the intestine (int). White arrowheads, ring furrow; white arrows, side furrow; black arrowheads; mouth, white double arrowheads, oocytes. Scale bars: a: 2 cm, d: 3 mm, e: 1 mm

Figure 2
Fig. 2

Morphology of the paratype specimen (juvenile) of Xenoturbella japonica sp. nov. a Live specimen with anterior to the top. b Left-ventral view of a contracted specimen after fixation with anterior to the left. ce MicroCT scans showing internal morphology. c Latitudinal section with anterior to the top. d Transverse section just anterior to the mouth. The epidermis (ep), intraepidermal nerve net (nn), basal lamina (bl) and muscle layer (ml) surround the intestine (int). e Longitudinal section with anterior to the left. The posterior epidermis, to the right, is curled due to contraction following fixation. White arrowheads, ring furrow; white arrows, side furrow; black arrow, statocyst; black arrowhead, mouth. Scale bars: a: 5 mm, d,e: 1 mm

Figure 3
Fig. 3

Frontal pore and the ventral glandular network of Xenoturbella. a–b: X. japonica sp. nov., holotype female specimen. a–a”: Reconstructed images showing the relative positions of the frontal pore, statocyst (blue), ventral glandular network (green) and the basal lamina (red). b: Longitudinal section with anterior to the left. c–d: X. japonica sp. nov., paratype juvenile specimen. c: Volume rendering image of the anteroventral tip. d: Longitudinal section with anterior to the left. e–h: X. bocki. e: Longitudinal section with anterior to the left. f: Latitudinal section with anterior to the top. g: Transverse section of the anterior part of an animal, with dorsal to the top. The frontal organ is present in the mid-ventral region (black square). h: Anterior part of a specimen pressed under a cover glass. White arrowheads, ventral glandular network; white arrows, frontal pore; black arrowhead, side furrow; black arrows, statocyst. Scale bars: a–a”: 600 μm, b,d: 1 mm, e,f: 500 μm

Locality. Holotype: off Jogashima, Miura, Kanagawa, Japan, 35°06.93″ N 139°33.72″ E to 35°06.95″ N 139°33.33″ E; 380–554 m depth (Additional file 4: Figure S1). Specimen found from sediment obtained using a marine biology dredge (Rigo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) on December 9th, 2015 during a research survey (December 9th to 10th, 2015; JAMBIO application number 27–7) headed by Dr. Hiroshi Namikawa, National Museum of Nature and Science, using the RV Rinkai-Maru of the Misaki Biological Marine Station, The University of Tokyo.

Paratype: Sanriku coast, Iwate, Japan, 39°37.86″ N 142°18.22″ E to 39°37.00″ N 142°17.60″ E; 517–560 m depth (Additional file 4: Figure S1). Specimen found inside the inner small plankton net with a mesh size of 0.5 mm attached inside a larger beam trawl [47]. Collected on July 18th, 2013 during a research cruise (July 18th to 29th, 2013) headed by Dr. Ken Fujimoto, National Research Institute of Fisheries Science, Fisheries Research Agency, aboard FRV Soyo-Maru of the National Research Institute of Fisheries Science, Fisheries Research Agency, Japan.

Description of female. Based on holotype. Body 5.3 cm in length; pale orange with coloration getting darker toward the anterior (Fig. 1a). In live specimens, muscles hold the dorsal body wall in a W-shape (three ridges and two troughs). Body shape actively changes by contracting and elongating when alive. Ring furrow and side furrow are present (Fig. 1a,b). Ventral mouth present, oval-shaped, just anterior to ring furrow (Fig. 1b,c). Glandular network present over ventral surface, starting near anterior tip of body and ending just in front of ring furrow (Fig. 1b–d). Internally, body wall with epidermis, circular and longitudinal muscles, parenchyma and gastrodermis present (Fig. 1e). Oocytes present within intestine (Fig. 1f). Statocyst situated near anterior tip of body, just inside side furrow (Fig. 3a,b).

Description of juvenile. Based on paratype. Similar to female, but differs as follows: body 1.1 cm in length; pale orange in color (Fig. 2a); dorsal body surface in live specimen smooth, lacking longitudinal ridges and troughs, similar to that of X. bocki; gametes not observed. Ventral glandular network not detected externally, but observed with microCT imaging (Figs. 2 and 3).

Genetic information. Whole mitochondrial genome sequences (15,244 bp in holotype; 15,249 bp in paratype) and partial Histone H3 gene sequences (346 bp in holotype; 413 bp in paratype) were determined and deposited as INSD accession numbers LC228486, LC228485, LC228579 and LC228578, respectively. Exogenous mitochondrial and rSSU sequences of the following bivalves were detected: Acila castrensis from the holotype; Nucula nucleus, Ennucula cardara, A. castrensis and Limaria fragilis from the paratype.

Frontal pore and ventral glandular network of X. japonica and X. bocki

Volume rendering imaging of the anterior end of the holotype X. japonica specimen revealed that a frontal pore was present at the anterior tip of the body, ventral to side furrow (Fig. 3a). MicroCT imaging confirmed the presence of the pore, and also showed that the ventral glandular network continued posteriorly from the pore while branching (Fig. 3a,b, Additional file 2: Video S2). Analyses of the paratype juvenile specimen also showed that a frontal pore was present, and that the ventral glandular network, a linear structure, continued posteriorly from the pore along the basal lamina (Fig. 3c,d, Additional file 3: Video S3). Based on the discovery of these structures in the new species, we decided to reinvestigate the type species of Xenoturbella, X. bocki. MicroCT imaging showed that the frontal pore and the ventral glandular network are also both present in X. bocki (Fig. 3e,f, Additional file 1: Video S1 and Additional file 3: Video S3). Histological sections and light microscopic observations confirmed the presence of the structure (Fig. 3g,h).

Molecular phylogenetic analyses

The mitochondrial genome sizes of the X. japonica holotype and paratype were 15,244 bp and 15,249 bp, respectively. The gene content and gene order were identical with those of other Xenoturbella species (Additional file 5: Figure S2) [45, 48, 49].

Phylogenetic analyses using nucleotide alignments of the six reported mitochondrial genomes and those of the two new specimens showed that, in accordance with a previous study [45], Xenoturbella species are clustered into two major groups (Fig. 4a). Xenoturbella japonica is a sister group to a clade consisting of X. bocki and X. hollandorum, a group which was termed ‘shallow’ in Rouse et al. (2016) [45]. The other group, comprising X. profunda, X. churro and X. monstrosa, formed a clade that has previously been termed ‘deep’ [45]. All nodes in the tree were strongly (BP = 100) supported.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Internal phylogeny of Xenoturbella. a Unrooted maximum likelihood tree of Xenoturbella species based on mitochondrial 13 protein-coding genes. Bootstrap values are shown at the nodes. H: holotype, P: paratype. AM, DQ: sequences deposited as AM296016 and DQ832701, respectively. b Pairwise genetic distances within and between Xenoturbella species calculated from cox1 alignments. “‘shallow’ clade” and “‘deep’ clade” show inter-species differences between species belonging to each clade only. In “all species”, inter-species differences between all xenoturbellid species are shown. Each box represents the inner 50% quantile (median marked by the solid line). Whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range, with circles indicating outliers. Original data are available in Additional file 6: Table S1

The pairwise genetic distances between the two collected specimens were compared with those of other xenoturbellids. Analyses using cox1, in which sequence data is available for the largest number of Xenoturbella specimens, showed that the genetic distance between the two new specimens are larger than almost all intra-species variations, but smaller than all inter-species variations (Fig. 4b, Additional file 6: Table S1). Analyses on either whole mitochondrial genomes, mitochondrial protein coding genes, or Histone H3 showed that the genetic distances between the two collected specimens were the smallest in all available pairwise genetic distance matrices (Additional file 7: Table S2).

Phylogenetic analyses of metazoans using mitochondrial genome sequences for the two new specimens resulted in different topology between data sets (Additional file 8: Figure S3, Additional file 9: Figure S4, Additional file 10: Figure S5 and Additional file 11: Figure S6). In agreement with previous studies [14, 45], this implies that mitochondrial genomes alone may not be suitable for resolving the phylogenetic positions of Xenoturbella and Xenacoelomorpha.

Discussion

The two new specimens collected off the Japanese coast were confirmed as xenoturbellids based on their morphology (Figs. 1, 2 and 3) and molecular phylogenetic analyses (Fig. 4, Additional file 8: Figure S3, Additional file 9: Figure S4, Additional file 10: Figure S5 and Additional file 11: Figure S6). The latter also showed that they do not belong to the five known species of Xenoturbella (Fig. 4, Additional file 6: Table S1 and Additional file 7: Table S2). But are the two specimens different species? Analyses of pairwise genetic distances showed that the distance between the two new specimens is larger than all xenoturbellid intra-species variations, except for three outliers seen among X. bocki cox1 sequences, but smaller than those of any inter-species pairs (Fig. 4b, Additional file 6: Table S1 and Additional file 7: Table S2). The two specimens were collected roughly 600 km apart, but X. monstrosa has been reported from two locations more than 2500 km apart, and X. monstrosa and X. churro have been shown to inhabit the same locality [45]. Therefore, the distance between the collection locations is not informative for species differentiation. There are morphological differences between the two specimens (Figs. 1, 2 and 3; Additional files 1: Video S1, Additional files 2: Video S2 and Additional files 3: Video S3), but these may be due to age differences. Therefore, until further specimens are collected, the two new xenoturbellids are considered as the same species, X. japonica, with the larger female specimen as the holotype and the smaller specimen, probably a juvenile, as a paratype.

DNA extraction experiments have yielded contaminating bivalve DNA from four of the five known Xenoturbella species [45, 50, 51]. In this study, DNA sequences with similarities to those of the following bivalves were detected from X. japonica; Nucula nucleus, Ennucula cardara, Acila castrensis and Limaria fragilis, further supporting the theory that Xenoturbella feeds on bivalves. Since none of these species were collected together with X. japonica, further studies are needed to verify if it feeds on these exact species, or on closely related species in the area.

All Pacific xenoturbellid species, including X. japonica in this study, were collected from depths greater than 500 m. The type locality for X. bocki is around 100 m, but the area is within the Gullmarsfjord, Sweden, known for its biodiversity of deep-sea animals living at a relatively shallow depth [11]. Therefore, Xenoturbella is probably a deep-sea fauna ancestrally. Considering Xenacoelomorpha, a clade inhabiting the deep-sea floor has been reported as a sister group to the rest of the acoels [52]. Comparison of acoels and Xenoturbella for morphological and physiological traits necessary for adapting to the deep-sea environment may provide insights into the ancestral habitat of Xenacoelomorpha.

We discovered a new structure in Xenoturbella - the frontal pore. It opens at the anterior tip of the animal, just below the side furrow, and connects with the ventral glandular network (Fig. 3, Additional file 1: Video S1, Additional file 2: Video S2 and Additional file 3: Video S3). Although previously not described from the well-studied X. bocki, reinvestigation revealed that the frontal pore is also present in this species (Fig. 3e–h, Additional file 1: Video S1 and Additional file 3: Video S3). MicroCT scanning, a method previously not applied to Xenoturbella, proved to be instrumental in this discovery. Since collections of Xenoturbella can be rare (less than four specimens each for 4 of the 6 species [45]), this non-destructive method promises to be a powerful tool for investigating the internal morphology of this soft-bodied animal. A frontal organ, which consists of a frontal pore at the anterior end and a group of mucous glands (frontal glands) connected to the pore, is present in a number of acoel and nemertodermatid species [5356], and has been suggested to be an ancestral trait for Acoelomorpha [57, 58]. Similarities in their overall morphologies and position tempts us to speculate that the frontal pore and ventral glandular network of xenoturbellids and the frontal organ of acoelomorphs are homologous and that the structure is a synapomorphy for Xenacoelomorpha. However, there are differences in their structures, with the acoelomorph frontal organ having a more elaborate morphology [5356]. Comparisons of the frontal pore and ventral glandular network of xenoturbellids and the acoelomorph frontal organ with respect to ultrastructure and the gene regulatory networks employed for morphogenesis may help to clarify the evolutionary relationship of these structures.

A previous study revealed that the five reported xenoturbellid species could be divided into two clades, ‘shallow’ and ‘deep’ [45]. Species of the first clade, X. bocki and X. hollandorum, live on the sea floor no deeper than 650 m and their body lengths are shorter than 4 cm. The ventral mouth is diamond shaped when animals are relaxed chemically. The ventral glandular network is not so conspicuous in this clade. The second clade consists of X. monstrosa, X. churro and X. profunda. These species have been reported from the seafloor between 1700 and 3700 m deep. They grow to be larger than the ‘shallow’ clade, reaching 10–20 cm in body length, with an obvious ventral glandular network and an oval mouth. Molecular phylogenetic analyses showed that X. japonica belong in the ‘shallow’ clade (Fig. 4a). The collected depth, body length, and the lack of an obvious ventral glandular network of the paratype specimen fit the characters of the ‘shallow’ clade. However, the holotype specimen shows characteristics of both clades. It was collected at 380–560 m depth, corresponding to the depth of the ‘shallow’ group. The body length of 5.3 cm falls between the two clades. Its oval mouth and conspicuous ventral glandular network suggest affinities to the ‘deep’ group. It is worth noting that the ventral epidermal network ends just anterior to the ring furrow in X. japonica, whereas the network passes the furrow posteriorly in X. monstrosa, X. churro and X. profunda [45]. Together with the lack of mature gametes, it is possible that the X. japonica holotype specimen is also still not fully grown, with the ventral epidermal network expanding posteriorly and the body lengthening with growth. Considering the phylogenetic position of X. japonica, it is parsimonious to regard characters common between this species and species in the ‘deep’ clade were present in the last common ancestor of Xenoturbella: body length over 5 cm, a well-developed ventral glandular network (and probably the frontal pore), and an oval mouth.

Conclusions

We have reported here the collection of two new specimens of Xenoturbella. Our discovery of Xenoturbella from the western Pacific Ocean greatly broadens the biogeographical range of the animal (Additional file 4: Figure S1). Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the two specimens revealed that they do not belong to the five previously described species. We propose that the new specimens belong to the same species, X. japonica, with the holotype specimen being female and the paratype specimen as juvenile, until further specimens are collected. MicroCT scanning established the presence of the frontal pore and ventral glandular network in Xenoturbella, and we suggest these structures as a new synapomorphy for Xenoturbella. X. japonica shows traits of both the ‘shallow’ and ‘deep’ groups, and therefore will be an important species for research on Xenoturbella and Xenacoelomorpha. This species can be collected using a marine biological dredge within a 1 h boat trip, and so promises to be a valuable source of information for investigating the evolution and diversity of deuterostomes and bilaterians.

Methods

Collection and sample handling

The holotype specimen was collected as stated in the results. Pictures were taken using a Nikon Df fitted with AI AF Micro Nikkor 105 mm F2.8D or with a Leica DFC290 HD digital camera mounted on a Leica M205C stereomicroscope. 7% MgCl2 in freshwater was used to relax the animal. Pieces of the animal were dissected and fixed in RNAlater for DNA extraction and then the partially dissected specimen was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in filtered seawater overnight, washed, and kept in 70% ethanol.

Collection of the paratype specimen was performed as described in the results. Pictures of the live animal were taken with an OLYMPUS OM-D E-M5, fitted with OLYMPUS M. ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 60 mm F2.8 Macro lens using a pair of Morris Hikaru Komachi Di flashes. The animal was anaesthetized in MgCl2 solution isotonic to seawater and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The sample was stored in 10% neutral buffered formalin at room temperature for about 8 months. Pictures of the fixed specimen were taken with a Leica DFC290 HD digital camera mounted on a Leica M205C stereomicroscope. It was then transferred and preserved in 90% ethanol at 4 °C. Pieces of the animal were dissected and used for DNA extraction and then microCT scanning was performed on the partially dissected specimen.

Both specimens are deposited in the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba (NSMT), Japan.

Xenoturbella bocki was collected as previously described in [3, 11] at the Sven Lovén Centre for Marine Infrastructure, Gothenburg University, Sweden. Animals were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in filtered sea water at 4 °C overnight, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series and stored in 70% or 95% ethanol. Histological sections were made and photographed according to our previous studies [3, 33].

MicroCT scanning and image analysis

Samples stored in 70% or 95% ethanol were either stained with 1% PTA solution in 70% ethanol [59] or were rehydrated through a graded ethanol series and stained with 25% Lugol solution (1:3 mixture of Lugol’s solution and deionized distilled water) [60]. The only exception was the paratype specimen, in which both staining methods were performed on a single sample. The staining time ranged from 3 to 48 h, depending on the size of the specimen. The stained samples were scanned using an X-ray microCT system (ScanXmate-E090S105; Comscan Techno) at a tube voltage peak of 60 kV and a tube current of 130 μA. During scanning, samples were rotated 360 degrees in steps of 0.1 to 0.18 degrees, generating 2000–3600 projection images of 992 × 992 pixels. Images were reconstructed using software provided with the X-ray microCT system (coneCTexpress; Comscan Techno) and volume data consisting of several hundred 8 bit TIFF files were obtained. For the X. japonica holotype and X. bocki No.2 samples, parts of the samples were scanned separately in order to obtain higher resolution images, and the reconstructed TIFF files were combined to generate data for the whole specimen. These data were used for analyses. 2D and 3D tomographic images were obtained using the OsiriX [61] and Tri/3D–BON (Ratoc System Engineering) software programs. Details of staining and scanning procedures are summarized in Additional file 12: Table S3.

DNA extraction and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from a piece of the X. japonica holotype specimen stored in RNAlater solution (Ambion) using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). Cytochrome-c-oxidase subunit I (cox1) and cytochrome B (cob) fragments were amplified by PCR, and purified with QIA quick Gel extraction Kit (Qiagen). Sequencing was carried out by a DNA sequencing service (Fasmac). Specific primers were designed from the sequences of the cox1 and cob, and the full-length mitochondrial genome was amplified as two overlapping fragments by PCR. Barcode sequences were added to 5′ end of the specific primers, and the PCR products were sequenced by Macrogen Japan using PacBio RS II Multiplexing Targeted Sequencing. PCR conditions (taq-polymerases, primers and amplification parameters) are shown in Additional file 13: Table S4. PacBio RS II reads were classified according to their barcode sequences using standalone BLAST (blastn, version 2.2.29), and aligned with MAFFT v7.221 [62] with a gap opening penalty of 0.1. Barcode sequences and ambiguous sites in the alignments were excluded using in-house Perl scripts. The mitochondrial genome of the X. japonica holotype specimen was obtained by concatenating two fragments, assembled from 573 reads (Average Coverage: 428) and 743 reads (Average Coverage: 558), respectively, from PacBio library.

Genomic DNA of the X. japonica paratype specimen was extracted using Allprep DNA/RNA FFPE Kit (QIAGEN). The extracted genomic DNA was fragmented to a target length of 600 bp by S220 Focused-Ultrasonicator (Covaris). Before preparing the library, the fragmented DNA was repaired using PreCR Repair Mix (New England Biolabs). Using the repaired DNA, a paired-end sequencing library was prepared with KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (KAPA Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Xenoturbella japonica paratype specimen genome sequence data were obtained using a 300 bp paired-end protocol on an Illumina Miseq instrument (Illumina). BLAST searches against mitochondrial sequences registered in Refseq and Silva SSU 119 were performed to extract contigs with similarities to mitochondrial genomes and ribosomal small subunit RNAs, respectively. The mitochondrial genome of the paratype was reconstructed by assembling 40,879 reads from a MiSeq library (Average Coverage: 465) using MITObim v1.8 [63], the X. bocki mitochondrial genome as an initial reference sequence.

The mitochondrial genomes of both X. japonica specimens were annotated using the MITOS web server, employing translation table 5 [64].

The nucleotide sequence of Histone H3 from the X. japonica holotype specimen was amplified by PCR, purified with QIA quick Gel extraction Kit (Qiagen), and ligated into pMD20-T vector (Takara Bio). The nucleotide sequences of the vectors were directly amplified from clones by PCR, purified using Exonuclease I and Calf intestine alkaline phosphatase (both Takara Bio), and sequenced using a DNA sequencing service (Fasmac). The PCR conditions (taq-polymerases, primers and amplification parameters) are shown in Additional file 13: Table S4. The nucleotide sequence of the paratype specimen Histone H3 was reconstructed from reads of MiSeq library: 182 reads showing high similarity (>85% identity) to the nucleotide sequence of X. bocki Histone H3 were identified in MiSeq library using a standalone BLASTn search and were aligned using MAFFT v7.221 with gap opening penalty of 0.5.

Sequences obtained were deposited in the International Nucleotide Sequence Database (INSD) through the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ).

Molecular phylogenetic analyses

For phylogenetic analyses of xenoturbellids, nucleotide sequences of the eight available mitochondrial genomes were aligned using MAFFT L-INS-i, and refined by Gblocks using the following parameters: b2 = 75%, b3 = 5, b4 = 5, b5 = half [65]. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred using RAxML (v8.1.11) under the GTR + gamma model with 100 bootstrap replicates.

For calculating pairwise genetic distances, amino acid sequences of 13 concatenated mitochondrial protein-coding genes and nucleotide sequences of whole mitochondrial genomes, nuclear histone H3 and cox1 genes were aligned using MAFFT L-INS-i. Pairwise distances were calculated using the R package ‘phangorn’ [66], employing the MtMam model for amino acid sequences and the JC69 model for nucleotide sequences. A nuclear histone H3 sequence was not available for X. churro. Among cox1 alignments, genetic distances between two non-overlapping sequences were not calculated.

Four different phylogenetic analyses of bilaterian mitochondrial genomes were performed. In three analyses (iiii), each dataset was aligned using MAFFT L-INS-i and ambiguous sites were removed with Gblocks using stringent parameters (b2 = 75%, b3 = 5, b4 = 5, b5 = half) [65]. RAxML was run under the LG4X + gamma model with the data partitioned by genes. In a fourth analysis (iv), genomes were aligned with MAFFT FFT-NS-i (faster but less accurate than MAFFT L-INS-i) and refined by Gblocks 0.91b [67] using less stringent condition parameters (b2 = 65%, b3 = 10, b4 = 5, b5 = all) [68]. The maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was carried out with RAxML v8.1.1 [69] under the GTR + gamma model with the data partitioned (−q option) by genes. Datasets used in the four analyses were amino acid sequences of 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes (atp6 and 8, cob, cox1–3, nad1–6 and nad4L) from 31 metazoans and six Xenoturbella sequences (same dataset as ref. [45]) with the addition of two new sequences acquired in this study, with the following differences between analyses. (i) all four acoelomorph species were excluded; (ii) all 31 metazoans and eight Xenoturbella data were used; (iii) non-bilaterian metazoans (3 sponges and 3 cnidarians) were excluded; (iv) all eight Xenoturbella and 31 metazoans mitochondrial genomes were used. The alignment lengths of the four phylogenetic analyses were: (i) 2179 aa; (ii) 2208 aa; (iii) 2202 aa; (iv) 2791 aa.

Abbreviations

Cob: 

Cytochrome B

cox1: 

Cytochrome C oxidase subunit I

DDBJ: 

DNA Data Bank of Japan

FRV: 

Fisheries research vessel

INSD: 

International Nucleotide Sequence Database

JAMBIO: 

Japanese Association for Marine Biology

microCT: 

micro computed tomography

NSMT: 

National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Japan

ROVs: 

Remotely operated vehicles

rSSU: 

Ribosomal small subunit

RV: 

Research vessel

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Ken Fujimoto, National Research Institute of Fisheries Science, Fisheries Research Agency, Hiroshi Namikawa, National Museum of Nature and Science, and all the people that participated in the research survey onboard FRV Soyo-Maru and RV Rinkai-Maru for the sample collections. We are grateful for Mamoru Sekifuji, Junko Inoue, Nao Oumi, and Mariko Kondo for collections and discussions. We also thank Shunsuke Yaguchi for reagents, Munetsugu Bam for discussions, and Atsuko Suzuki for taking photographs of the holotype specimen. We thank the staff at Sven Lovén Centre for Marine Infrastructure, Gothenburg University, Sweden for their help in the X. bocki collections. We thank Maurice R. Elphick for critical reading of the manuscript. We are grateful to Yasunori Saito for equipment and discussions, who sadly passed away in December 2015.

Funding

This work was supported by the NIG Collaborative Research Program (2014-A36, 2015-A128, and 2016-A127), the KVA fund for 2015 and 2016, JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (JP26711022), and JAMBIO, Japanese Association for Marine Biology, as a program of Joint Usage/Research Center by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the conclusions of this article are available as follows. Sequence data have been deposited in the International Nucleotide Sequence Database (INSD) through the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ), with the accession numbers in the text. The original microCT files are available in the figshare repository; https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5330908 [70].

Authors’ contributions

HN conceived the project. For the X. japonica holotype specimen, HN, AO and HK made the initial external observations. HN and KK made the initial external observations for the paratype specimen. HN, HK, AM and TS performed the microCT analyses, and HN, HM, RK, MK and NS analyzed the sequence data. HN drafted the paper with HM and AM, and all authors read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Shimoda Marine Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Shizuoka, Japan
(2)
Mammalian Genetics Laboratory, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan
(3)
Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
(4)
DNA Sequencing Section, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan
(5)
Marine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan
(6)
Misaki Marine Biological Station, The University of Tokyo, Miura, Japan
(7)
Present address: Sado Marine Biological Station, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan

References

  1. Westblad E. Xenoturbella bocki n.g, n.sp, a peculiar, primitive turbellarian type. Ark Zool. 1949;1:3–29.Google Scholar
  2. Raikova O, Reuter M, Jondelius U, Gustafsson M. An immunocytochemical and ultrastructural study of the nervous and muscular systems of Xenoturbella westbladi (Bilateria inc. sed.). Zoomorphology. 2000;120:107–18. doi:10.1007/s004350000028
  3. Stach T, Dupont S, Israelsson O, Fauville G, Nakano H, Kånneby T, et al. Nerve cells of Xenoturbella bocki (phylum uncertain) and Harrimania kupfferi (Enteropneusta) are positively immunoreactive to antibodies raised against echinoderm neuropeptides. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 2005;85:1519–24. doi:10.1017/S0025315405012725.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Jagersten G. Further remarks on the early phylogeny of Metazoa. Zool Bidr Upps. 1959;33:79–108.Google Scholar
  5. Ehlers U, Sopott-Ehlers B. Ultrastructure of the subepidermal musculature of Xenoturbella bocki, the adelphotaxon of the Bilateria. Zoomorphology. 1997;117:71–9. doi:10.1007/s004350050032.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Reisinger E. Was ist Xenoturbella? Z Wiss Zool. 1960;164:188–98.Google Scholar
  7. Pedersen KJ, Pedersen LR. Fine structural observations on the extracellular matrix (ECM) of Xenoturbella bocki Westblad, 1949. Acta Zool. 1986;67:103–13. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6395.1986.tb00854.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Israelsson O. And molluscan embryogenesis. Nature. 1997;390:32. 10.1038/36246. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Telford MJ. Xenoturbellida: the fourth deuterostome phylum and the diet of worms. Genesis. 2008;46:580–6. doi:10.1002/dvg.20414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Edgecombe GD, Giribet G, Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Kristensen RM, Neves RC, et al. Higher-level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions. Org Divers Evol. 2011;11:151–72. doi:10.1007/s13127-011-0044-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Nakano H. What is Xenoturbella? Zoolog Lett. 2015;1:22. doi:10.1186/s40851-015-0018-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hejnol A, Obst M, Stamatakis A, Ott M, Rouse GW, Edgecombe GD, et al. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc Biol Sci. 2009;276:4261–70. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0896.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Copley RR, Moroz LL, Nakano H, Poustka AJ, et al. Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature. 2011;470:255–8. 10.1038/nature09676.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Cannon JT, Vellutini BC, Smith J III, Ronquist F, Jondelius U, Hejnol A. Xenacoelomorpha is the sister group to Nephrozoa. Nature. 2016;530:89–93. doi:10.1038/nature16520.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehlers U. On the fine structure of Paratomella rubra Rieger & Ott (Acoela) and the position of the taxon Paratomella Dorjes in a phylogenetic system of the Acoelomorpha (Plathelminthes). Microfauna Mar. 1992;7:265–93.Google Scholar
  16. Ehlers U. Dermonephridia- modified epidermal cells with a probable excretory function in Paratomella rubru (Acoela, Plathelminthes). Microfauna Mar. 1992;7:253–64.Google Scholar
  17. Katayama T, Yamamoto M, Wada H, Satoh N. Phylogenetic position of acoel turbellarians inferred from partial 18S rDNA sequences. Zool Sci. 1993;10:529–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Haszprunar G. The Mollusca: Coelomate turbellarians or mesenchymate annelids? In: Taylor JD, editor. Origin and evolutionary radiation of the Mollusca. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 1–28.Google Scholar
  19. Haszprunar G. Plathelminthes and Plathelminthomorpha- paraphyletic taxa. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 1996;34:41–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruiz-Trillo I, Riutort M, Littlewood DTJ, Herniou EA, Baguna J. Acoel flatowrms: earliest extant bilaterian metazoans, not members of Platyhelminthes. Science. 1999;283:1919–23. 10.1126/science.283.5409.1919.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Martinez P, Riutort M, Baguna J. Acoel flatworms are not Platyhelminthes: evidence from phylogenomics. PLoS One. 2007;2:e717. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000717.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardiner EG. Early development of Polychoerus caudatus, Mark. J Morphol. 1895;11:155–76. doi:10.1002/jmor.1050110104.
  23. Ramachandra NB, Gates RD, Ladurner P, Jacobs DK, Hartenstein V. Embryonic development in the primitive bilaterian Neochildia fusca: normal morphogenesis and isolation of POU genes Brn-1 and Brn-3. Dev Genes Evol. 2002;212:55–69. doi:10.1007/s00427-001-0207-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakano H, Lundin K, Bourlat SJ, Telford MJ, Funch P, Nyengaard JR, et al. Xenoturbella bocki exhibits direct development with similarities to Acoelomorpha. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1537. doi:10.1038/ncomms2556.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Franzen A, Afzelius BA. The ciliated epidermis of Xenoturbella bocki (Platyhelminthes Xenoturbellida) with some phylogenetic considerations. Zool Scripta. 1987;16:9–17. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1987.tb00046.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Rohde K, Watson N, Cannon LRG. Ultrastructure of epidermal cilia of Pseudactinoposthia sp. (Platyhelminthes, Acoela): implications for the phylogenetic status of the Xenoturbellida and Acoelomorpha. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 1988;20:759–67.Google Scholar
  27. Lundin K. The epidermal ciliary rootlets of Xenoturbella bocki (Xenoturbellida) revisited: new support for a possible kinship with the Acoelomorpha (Platyhelminthes). Zool Scripta. 1998;27:263–70. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1998.tb00440.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lundin K. Degenerating epidermis cells in Xenoturbella bocki (phylum uncertain), Nemertodermatida and Acoela (Platyhelminthes). Belgian. J Zool. 2001;131:153–7.Google Scholar
  29. Ehlers U. Comparative morphology of statocysts in the Platyhelminthes and the Xenoturbellida. Hydrobiologia. 1991;227:263–71. doi:10.1007/BF00027611.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Israelsson O. Ultrastructural aspects of the ‘statocyst’ of Xenoturbella (Deuterostomia) cast doubt on its function as a georeceptor. Tissue Cell. 2007;39:171–7. doi:10.1016/j.tice.2007.03.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lundin K, Hendelberg J. Is the sperm type of the Nemertodermatida close to that of the ancestral Platyhelminthes? Hydrobiologia. 1998;383:197–205. doi:10.1023/A:1003439512957. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Petrov A, Hooge M, Tyler S. Ultrastructure of sperms in Acoela (Acoelomorpha) and its concordance with molecular systematics. Invert Biol. 2004;123:183–97. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7410.2004.tb00154.x. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Obst M, Nakano H, Bourlat SJ, Thorndyke MC, Telford MJ, Nyengaard JR, et al. Spermatozoon ultrastructure of Xenoturbella bocki (Westblad 1949). Acta Zool. 2011;92:109–15. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6395.2010.00496.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Henry JQ, Martindale MQ, Boyer BC. The unique developmental program of the acoel flatworm, Neochildia fusca. Dev Biol. 2000;220:285–95. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.9628.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Jondelius U, Larsson K, Raikova O. Cleavage in Nemertoderma westbladi (Nemertodermatida) and its phylogenetic significance. Zoomorphology. 2004;123:221–5. doi:10.1007/s00435-004-0105-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Børve A, Hejnol A. Development and juvenile anatomy of the nemertodermatid Meara stichopi (Bock) Westblad 1949 (Acoelomorpha). Front Zool. 2014;11:50. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-11-50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Lowe CJ, Pani AM. Animal evolution: a soap opera of unremarkable worms. Curr Biol. 2011;21:R151–3. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hejnol A, Martin-Duran JM. Getting to the bottom of anal evolution. Zool Anz. 2015;256:61–74. doi:10.1016/j.jcz.2015.02.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Gavilan B, Perea-Atienza E, Martinez P. Xenacoelomorpha: a case of independent nervous system centralization? Phil Trans R Soc B. 2016;371:20150039. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0039.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Haszprunar G. Review of data for a morphological look on Xenacoelomorpha (Bilateria incertae sedis). Org Divers Evol. 2016;16:363–89. doi:10.1007/s13127-015-0249-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Hejnol A, Pang K. Xenacoelomorpha’s significance for understanding bilaterian evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016;39:48–54. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2016.05.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Telford MJ, Copley RR. Zoology: war of the worms. Curr Biol. 2016;26:R319–37. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Robertson HE, Lapraz F, Egger B, Telford MJ, Schiffer PH. The mitochondrial genomes of the acoelomorph worms Paratomella rubra, Isodiametra pulchra and Archaphanostoma ylvae. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1847. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01608-4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Israelsson O. New light on the enigmatic Xenoturbella (phylum uncertain): ontogeny and phylogeny. Phil Trans R Soc B. 1999;266:835–41. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0713.Google Scholar
  45. Rouse GW, Wilson NG, Carvajal JI, Vrijenhoek RC. New deep-sea species of Xenoturbella and the position of Xenacoelomorpha. Nature. 2016;530:94–7. doi:10.1038/nature16545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Bourlat SJ, Juliusdottir T, Lowe CJ, Freeman R, Aronowicz J, Kirschner M, et al. Deuterostome phylogeny reveals monophyletic chordates and the new phylum Xenoturbellida. Nature. 2006;444:85–8. doi:10.1038/nature05241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Akiyama T, Shimomura M, Nakamura K. Collection of deep-sea small arthropods: gears for collection and processing of samples on deck. TAXA. 2008;24:27–32.Google Scholar
  48. Pereske M, Hankeln T, Weich B, Fritzsch G, Stadler PF, Israelsson O, et al. The mitochondrial DNA of Xenoturbella bocki: genomic architecture and phylogenetic analysis. Theory Biosci. 2007;126:35. doi:10.1007/s12064-007-0007-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Bourlat SJ, Rota-Stabelli O, Lanfear R, Telford MJ. The mitochondrial genome structure of Xenoturbella bocki (phylum Xenoturbellida) is ancestral within the deuterostomes. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:107. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-9-107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Bourlat SJ, Nielsen C, Lockyer AE, Littlewood DTJ, Telford MJ. Xenoturbella is a deuterostome that eats molluscs. Nature. 2003;424:925–8. doi:10.1038/nature01851.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Bourlat SJ, Nakano H, Akerman M, Telford MJ, Thorndyke MC, Obst M. Feeding ecology of Xenoturbella bocki (phylum Xenoturbellida) revealed by genetic barcoding. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008;8:18–22. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01959.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Arroyo AS, López-Escardó D, de Vargas C, Ruiz-Trillo I. Hidden diversity of Acoelomorpha revealed through metabarcoding. Biol Lett. 2016;12:20160674. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2016.0674.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Klauser MD, Smith IIIJPS, Tyler S. Ultrastructure of the frontal organ in Convoluta and Macrostomum spp.: significance for models of the turbellarian archetype. Hydrobiologia. 1985;132:47–52. doi:10.1007/BF00046227. View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith JPS III, Tyler S. Fine-structure and evolutionary implications of the frontal organ in Turbellaria Acoela: 1. Diopisthoporus gymnopharyngeus sp.n. Zool Scripta. 1985;14:91–102. doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1985.tb00180.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith JPS III, Tyler S. Frontal organs in the Acoelomorpha (Turbellaria): ultrastructure and phylogenetic significance. Hydrobiologia. 1986;132:71–8. doi:10.1007/BF00046231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Ehlers U. Frontal glandular and sensory structures in Nemertoderma (Nermertodermatida) and Paratomella (Acoela): ultrastructure and phylogenetic implications for the monophyly of the Euplathelminthes (Plathelminthes). Zoomorphology. 1992;112:227–36. doi:10.1007/BF01632820.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Jondelius U, Wallberg A, Hooge M, Raikova OI. How the worm got its pharynx: phylogeny, classification and Bayesian assessment of character evolution in Acoela. Syst Biol. 2011;60:845–71. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Achatz JG, Chiodin M, Salvenmoser W, Tyler S, Martinez P. The Acoela: on their kind and kinships, especially with nemertodermatids and xenoturbellids (Bilateria incertae sedis). Org Divers Evol. 2013;13:267–86. doi:10.1007/s13127-012-0112-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Metscher BD. MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues. BMC Physiol. 2009;9:11. doi:10.1186/1472-6793-9-11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Degenhardt K, Wright AC, Horng D, Padmanabhan A, Epstein JA. Rapid 3D phenotyping of cardiovascular development in mouse embryos by micro-CT with iodine staining. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:314–22. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.918482.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O. OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging. 2004;17:205–16. doi:10.1007/s10278-004-1014-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80. doi:10.1093/molbev/mst010.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Hahn C, Bachmann L, Chevreux B. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads—a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucl Acids Res. 2013;41:e129. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt371.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Bernt M, Donath A, Juhling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Frizsch G, et al. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69:313–9. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Philippe H, Brinkmann H, Lavrov DV, Littlewood DTJ, Manuel M, Worheide G, et al. Resolving difficult phylogenetic questions: why more sequences are not enough. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1000602. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000602.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Schliep KP. Phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:592–3. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:540–52. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, Pang K, Browne WE, Smith SA, et al. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature. 2008;452:745–9. doi:10.1038/nature06614.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Nakano H, Miyazawa H, Maeno A, Shiroishi T, Kakui K, Koyanagi R, et al. Micro CT files from ‘A new species of Xenoturbella from the western Pacific Ocean and the evolution of Xenoturbella’. figshare. 2017. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.5330908.
  71. Wessel P, Smith WHF, Scharroo R, Luis J, Wobbe F. Generic mapping tools: improved version released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union. 2013;94:409–10. doi:10.1002/2013EO450001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement