Fine-scale assessment of genetic diversity of trembling aspen in northwestern North America

Latutrie, Mathieu; Bergeron, Yves; Tremblay, Francine

doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0810-1

BMC Ecology and Evolution

Table 1 Descriptive genetic composition of 27 Populus tremuloides populations in northwestern North America

From: Fine-scale assessment of genetic diversity of trembling aspen in northwestern North America

Population	Latitude	Longitude	N	G	AR^a	Na	Ne	Ho	He	Fis
Pass	53.603	−101.677	20	9	4.48	4.9 ± 0.69	3.1 ± 0.68	0.58 ± 0.09	0.57 ± 0.07	0.01 ± 0.08
Morin Lake	55.143	−106.072	34	19	4.46	5.8 ± 0.71	3.4 ± 0.56	0.64 ± 0.07	0.65 ± 0.05	0.01 ± 0.1
Biggar	52.315	−107.768	36	18	4.97	7.2 ± 0.94	3.5 ± 0.6	0.62 ± 0.05	0.64 ± 0.05	0.02 ± 0.06
Peter Pond	55.744	−108.776	14	11	3.94	4.5 ± 0.69	3.0 ± 0.52	0.72 ± 0.07	0.61 ± 0.04	−0.2 ± 0.11
Calling Lake	55.292	−112.970	36	26	5.08	8.5 ± 1.28	4.1 ± 1.09	0.58 ± 0.07	0.63 ± 0.07	0.05 ± 0.04
Red Earth	56.607	−115.308	33	29	4.82	7.9 ± 0.98	3.5 ± 0.61	0.64 ± 0.06	0.66 ± 0.05	0.01 ± 0.06
High Level	58.338	−117.237	18	10	4.06	4.5 ± 0.48	2.9 ± 0.36	0.65 ± 0.06	0.6 ± 0.05	−0.1 ± 0.09
Ministik	53.276	−112.932	31	14	4.11	5 ± 0.89	3.2 ± 0.54	0.68 ± 0.09	0.59 ± 0.07	−0.18 ± 0.13
Alders Flat	52.602	−114.964	26	16	3.98	5.2 ± 0.76	2.9 ± 0.36	0.76 ± 0.07	0.61 ± 0.04	−0.26 ± 0.13
Hinton	53.429	−117.531	22	22	4.92	7.6 ± 1.15	3.9 ± 0.92	0.62 ± 0.07	0.64 ± 0.05	0.05 ± 0.05
Dunvegan	55.828	−118.263	33	27	4.56	7.3 ± 0.96	3.5 ± 0.92	0.6 ± 0.06	0.61 ± 0.05	0 ± 0.04
Dawson Creek	55.778	−120.816	8	7	4.7	4.7 ± 0.7	2.9 ± 0.59	0.56 ± 0.07	0.57 ± 0.05	0.03 ± 0.05
Fort Nelson	58.111	−122.746	37	20	4.29	6 ± 1.13	3.4 ± 0.93	0.66 ± 0.06	0.6 ± 0.05	−0.11 ± 0.07
Liard Spring	59.355	−125.957	24	24	4.76	7.3 ± 0.98	3.9 ± 0.83	0.63 ± 0.07	0.65 ± 0.06	0.04 ± 0.03
Simpson Lake	60.676	−129.222	12	11	4.81	5.6 ± 0.64	3.3 ± 0.6	0.64 ± 0.06	0.63 ± 0.05	−0.01 ± 0.06
Whitehorse	60.784	−136.025	17	13	4.46	5.7 ± 0.99	3.3 ± 0.74	0.58 ± 0.07	0.59 ± 0.06	−0.01 ± 0.09
Taylor Hwy	63.887	−142.243	15	15	4.79	6.3 ± 1.04	3.7 ± 0.76	0.63 ± 0.05	0.63 ± 0.06	−0.03 ± 0.07
Tok	63.370	−142.566	26	26	4.51	6.9 ± 0.91	3.6 ± 0.81	0.6 ± 0.05	0.63 ± 0.05	0.05 ± 0.05
Delta	63.809	−145.094	12	12	4.83	5.8 ± 0.95	3.7 ± 0.99	0.53 ± 0.06	0.63 ± 0.05	0.17 ± 0.06
Glennallen	62.005	−145.341	29	29	4.87	7.5 ± 1.16	3.8 ± 0.83	0.61 ± 0.06	0.65 ± 0.06	0.06 ± 0.03
Chena Park	65.105	−147.531	15	15	4.82	5.9 ± 0.69	3.7 ± 0.75	0.71 ± 0.07	0.66 ± 0.05	−0.07 ± 0.09
Steese Hwy	65.161	−147.743	58	56	4.89	9.5 ± 1.27	4.1 ± 1.04	0.65 ± 0.05	0.65 ± 0.05	0 ± 0.04
Fairbanks	64.902	−148.277	9	9	4.67	5.1 ± 0.43	3.3 ± 0.56	0.63 ± 0.05	0.63 ± 0.05	−0.02 ± 0.07
Richardson	64.267	−149.200	10	10	4.47	5.4 ± 0.52	2.9 ± 0.31	0.63 ± 0.05	0.6 ± 0.05	−0.05 ± 0.04
Palmer	61.581	−149.249	27	27	4.81	7.5 ± 1.28	3.9 ± 0.9	0.6 ± 0.06	0.66 ± 0.05	0.08 ± 0.05
Kenai	60.480	−149.724	17	17	5.22	7.3 ± 1.05	4.3 ± 0.96	0.65 ± 0.07	0.65 ± 0.07	−0.01 ± 0.06
Coldfoot	67.425	−150.144	31	31	4.85	8 ± 1.22	3.8 ± 0.91	0.6 ± 0.05	0.65 ± 0.05	0.07 ± 0.04

N number of sampled trees genotyped, G number of unique genotypes used in the analyses, AR allelic richness, N _a average number of alleles per locus, N _e average number of effective alleles per locus, H _o observed heterozygosity, H _e expected heterozygosity, F _is interbreeding coefficient
^aCalculated with rarefaction method based on the minimum number of unique genotypes

Back to article page

ISSN: 2730-7182

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com