Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Comparisons of slopes and intercepts of the regression of the log(Nm) as estimated by the island model ( N m 1 4 ( 1 F S T 1 ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGaemOta4KaemyBa0MaeyisISBcfa4aaSaaaeaacqaIXaqmaeaacqaI0aanaaGcdaqadaqaaKqbaoaalaaabaGaeGymaedabaGaemOray0aaSbaaeaacqWGtbWucqWGubavaeqaaaaakiabgkHiTiabigdaXaGaayjkaiaawMcaaaaa@3B30@ ) on log(geographic distance) for the four regions considered

From: Gene flow rise with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

Comparisons Significance of intercept differences Significance of slope differences
Ardennes vs. Pyrenees **** ****
Morvan vs Ardennes ** NS
Asturias vs Pyrenees ** **
Asturias + Pyrenees vs. Ardennes + Morvan ** **
  1. NS: non significant; **: P < 0.05; ****:P < 0.001