Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of divergence time estimates between different time constraints and studies

From: Mitogenomic evaluation of the historical biogeography of cichlids toward reliable dating of teleostean divergences

Divergence

This study1

This study2

This study3

Yamanoue et al. [55]

Inoue et al. [54]

Cichlidae vs. Pomacentridae

127 (107 – 149)

144 (134 – 154)

137 (115 – 160)

-

-

Takifugu vs. Tetraodon

70 (55 – 86)

78 (65 – 93)

76 (60 – 94)

73 (57 – 94)

-

Tetraodontidae vs. Gasterosteus

154 (131 – 177)

170 (156 – 185)

161 (137 – 185)

192 (153 – 235)

-

Cichlidae vs. Oryzias

136 (115 – 159)

152 (141 – 165)

148 (125 – 171)

-

-

Cichlidae/Oryzias vs. Tetraodontidae

159 (136 – 183)

176 (163 – 191)

166 (142 – 191)

184 (154 – 221)

-

Percomorpha vs. Beryciformes

182 (157 – 206)

198 (183 – 215)

188 (162 – 214)

206 (174 – 245)

-

Acanthopterygii vs. Gadiformes

191 (166 – 216)

207 (190 – 224)

202 (176 – 229)

223 (191 – 264)

-

Acanthomorpha vs. Protacanthopterygii

249 (223 – 274)

262 (243 – 281)

270 (243 – 294)

280 (240 – 326)

232 (197 – 267)

Cyprinus vs. Danio

139 (111 – 169)

147 (120 – 174)

135 (107 – 164)

167 (131 – 208)

-

Euteleostei vs. Otocephala

276 (250 – 301)

288 (268 – 307)

291 (264 – 314)

315 (270 – 363)

278 (241 – 314)

Teleostei vs. Amiiformes

360 (339 – 376)

365 (348 – 378)

381 (363 – 392)

390 (340 – 442)

376 (337 – 413)

Sarcopterygii vs. Actinopterygii

428 (417 – 448)

429 (417 – 449)

428 (417 – 449)

470 (415 – 524)

451 (413 – 495)

  1. The means and 95% credibility ranges (in parentheses) are shown for estimated divergence times.
  2. 1 Without biogeography-based time constraints on cichlid divergences (see Fig. 2).
  3. 2 With biogeography-based time constraints on cichlid divergences (see Fig. 4).
  4. 3 Without biogeography-based time constraints on cichlid divergences, but assuming the Ancient Fish Clade (see text).