- Research article
- Open Access
Nucleotide diversity in the mitochondrial and nuclear compartments of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: investigating the origins of genome architecture
© Smith and Lee; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 04 March 2008
Accepted: 21 May 2008
Published: 21 May 2008
The magnitude of intronic and intergenic DNA can vary substantially both within and among evolutionary lineages; however, the forces responsible for this disparity in genome compactness are conjectural. One explanation, termed the mutational-burden hypothesis, posits that genome compactness is primarily driven by two nonadaptive processes: mutation and random genetic drift – the effects of which can be discerned by measuring the nucleotide diversity at silent sites (πsilent), defined as noncoding sites and the synonymous sites of protein-coding regions. The mutational-burden hypothesis holds that πsilent is negatively correlated to genome compactness. We used the model organism Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, which has a streamlined, coding-dense mitochondrial genome and an noncompact, intron-rich nuclear genome, to investigate the mutational-burden hypothesis. For measuring πsilent we sequenced the complete mitochondrial genome and portions of 7 nuclear genes from 7 geographical isolates of C. reinhardtii.
We found significantly more nucleotide diversity in the nuclear compartment of C. reinhardtii than in the mitochondrial compartment: net values of πsilent for the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes were 32 × 10-3 and 8.5 × 10-3, respectively; and when insertions and deletions (indels) are factored in, these values become 49 × 10-3 for the nuclear DNA and 11 × 10-3 for the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Furthermore, our investigations of C. reinhardtii revealed 4 previously undiscovered mitochondrial introns, one of which contains a fragment of the large-subunit (LSU) rRNA gene and another of which is found in a region of the LSU-rRNA gene not previously reported (for any taxon) to contain introns.
At first glance our results are in opposition to the mutational-burden hypothesis: πsilent was approximately 4 times greater in the nuclear compartment of C. reinhardtii relative to the mitochondrial compartment. However, when we consider the encumbrance of noncoding DNA in each of these C. reinhardtii compartments, we conclude that introns in the mtDNA impose a greater burden than those in the nuclear DNA and suggest that the same may be true for the intergenic regions. Overall, we cannot reject the mutational-burden hypothesis and feel that more data on nucleotide diversity from green algae and other protists are needed.
Genomic sequence data from the three domains of life have revealed a prodigious range of genome compactnesses; however, our knowledge of the processes responsible for this gamut of genomic architectures is contentious. One explanation is the mutational-burden hypothesis [1–4], which posits that genome compactness (defined by the proportion of intronic and intergenic DNA) is primarily driven by nonadaptive processes: namely, mutation and random genetic drift. The mutational-burden hypothesis asserts that noncoding DNA (i.e., intronic and intergenic DNA) is a genetic liability because it is a target for deleterious and potentially lethal mutations, such as mutations affecting sequences involved with intron splicing and gene regulation. The hypothesis maintains that species with large effective population sizes (N e ) are more efficient at purging, or preventing the proliferation of, hazardous-noncoding DNA because they experience less random genetic drift and thereby increase the efficacy of natural selection. The mutational-burden hypothesis holds that the product of N e and the mutation rate (μ) drives genome compactness; consequently, species whose genomes are coding rich should have a higher N e μ than those whose genomes carry a surfeit of intronic and intergenic DNA.
Insights into N e and μ can be acquired by measuring the nucleotide diversity at silent sites (πsilent), which are defined as noncoding sites and synonymous sites within protein-coding DNA. Since, for a diploid population at mutation-drift equilibrium, the rate at which new variation is introduced to a neutral-nucleotide site in two randomly compared alleles is equivalent to 2μ (twice the mutation rate), and the rate at which variation is lost from a neutral site is 1/2N e , then the average number of nucleotide differences per neutral site is equivalent to the ratio of these two rates: 4N e μ. Because silent sites are typically regarded as among the most neutrally evolving positions in a genome, measures of πsilent can provide an estimate of 4N e μ. This formula can be simplified by substituting N g , the effective number of genes per locus in a population, for N e , giving a final equation of πsilent = 2N g μ, where N g is equal to N e for nuclear genes of haploid species and about one-half N e for uniparentally-transmitted organelle genes . Uniparentally-transmitted organelle genomes (mitochondrial or chloroplast) are generally considered haploid, despite being present in multiple copies per cell, because heteroplasmy (the existence of more than one organelle-genome haplotype in the same individual) is rare. Moreover, in this instance, N g is reduced further by the fact that during sexual reproduction only one of the parental sexual types transmits organelle genes to the next generation.
Large-scale studies have found a positive correlation between πsilent and genome compactness: in the compact genomes of prokaryotes πsilent tends to be > 50 × 10-3; in the more bloated nuclear genomes of invertebrates and land plants it is in the range of 3 × 10-3 to 15 × 10-3; and in the nuclear genomes of vertebrates, where noncoding DNA predominates, it appears to lie between 2 × 10-3 and 4 × 10-3 . There is evidence that this trend is also found in organelle genomes: comparative studies of nucleotide diversity in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) indicate that in the diminutive, coding-dense mitochondrial genomes of mammals πsilent is around 40 × 10-3, whereas in the expanded mitochondrial genomes of land plants it is estimated to be < 0.4 × 10-3 . This disparity in πsilent between land-plant and mammalian mitochondrial genomes is believed to be a reflection of the high mutation rates in mammalian mtDNA and the low mutation rates typically found in land-plant mtDNA. Mutation rates have also been invoked to explain why, despite similar proposed values of N g , the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes of mammals have opposite coding densities – in mammals estimates of μ for mtDNA are roughly 30 times those for nuclear DNA . Although the relationship between πsilent and genome architecture is intriguing, the empirical data from which these correlations were derived are limited to a relatively small number of taxa and are generally skewed towards multicellular animals, with an overall lack of data for unicellular eukaryotes, especially green algae.
The model organism Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a unicellular green alga of the chlorophycean class, is an excellent system for studying the evolution of genome compactness because it has a large, intron-rich nuclear genome and a small, compact mitochondrial genome, yet both genomes appear to have a similar mutation rate [6, 7]. The nuclear genome of C. reinhardtii, which has been sequenced to 95% completion, is approximately 121 megabases (Mb), with about 17% of the nucleotides coding for proteins and structural RNAs . Furthermore, the genome has an abundance of introns (~7 per protein-coding gene), and the average intron length is longer than that of many eukaryotes and is more similar to multicellular organisms than to protists. In contrast, the mitochondrial genome of the standard laboratory strains of C. reinhardtii (derived from the Ebersold-Levine line) is streamlined, having a size of 15.8 kb and containing only 13 genes [9–11]. Moreover, at 82% coding it is one of the most compact mitochondrial genomes available from green algae (for a compilation see ), and although the mtDNA of one geographical isolate of C. reinhardtii (CC-1373) has an optional intron in cob  it is still > 75% coding; this strain is often referred to as Chlamydomonas smithii but is in fact a member of the C. reinhardtii species .
According to the mutational-burden hypothesis, we would expect C. reinhardtii to have a high degree of silent-site nucleotide diversity in its mitochondrial genome (reflecting a large 2N g μ) and a low degree of silent-site nucleotide diversity in its nuclear genome (reflecting a small 2N g μ). To test this hypothesis and to investigate the correlation of 2N g μ with genome compactness, we measured πsilent in the mitochondrial and nuclear compartments from various geographical isolates of C. reinhardtii.
Strains and their genetic loci
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strains used in this study.
Geographical Origin (USA)
Harris 1989 
South Deerfield, Massachusetts
Hoshaw and Ettl 1966 
Gross et al. 1988 
Spanier et al. 1992 
Spanier et al. 1992 
Durham, North Carolina
Harris 1989 
Spanier et al. 1992 
We were able to obtain the complete mtDNA sequence from an 8th strain of C. reinhardtii (CC-503) by collecting and assembling mtDNA sequences that were generated from the C. reinhardtii nuclear-genome sequencing project [8, 19]. Both C. reinhardtii CC-503 and C. reinhardtii CC-277 (one of the 7 isolates described in Table 1) are cell-wall-less mutants recovered from the same "Ebersold-Levine" wild-type background of C. reinhardtii, but they have been separated for at least 35 years . The mtDNA sequence of C. reinhardtii CC-503 is identical to that of C. reinhardtii CC-277; and when we downloaded the sequences of the 7 nuclear loci for C. reinhardtii CC-503, they too were identical to those of C. reinhardtii CC-277. Therefore, for the purpose of this study we will be considering C. reinhardtii MA-1 as synonymous with C. reinhardtii CC-277 and CC-503.
Prior to this study a complete mtDNA sequence for C. reinhardtii was already available (Genbank accession number NC_001638); this sequence, which resulted from the accumulated efforts of multiple parties, mostly came from C. reinhardtii CC-277, or in some cases from strains having the same genetic background as C. reinhardtii CC-277. The mtDNA sequence of C. reinhardtii CC-277 presented here differs at 46 positions relative to NC_001638; because 44 of these 46 differences are also present in the mtDNA of the other six C. reinhardtii isolates described here and because the C. reinhardtii CC-277 mtDNA sequence from this study was shown to be identical to the C. reinhardtii CC-503 mitochondrial genome, we feel that our version of the C. reinhardtii CC-277 mtDNA is currently the most accurate and that the discrepancies between our sequence and NC_001638 are the result of sequencing errors in the latter.
It is important to note that our annotation of the C. reinhardtii mitochondrial genome (Figure 1) does not contain the so-called rRNA-coding modules L2b and L3a. In previous studies each these modules was presumed to code for a non-core region of the large-subunit (LSU) rRNA . However, because sequence homologs of L2b and L3a have not been identified in the mtDNA of close relatives to C. reinhardtii [7, 22, 23], or in any other genome, we have classified these regions as intergenic DNA, and have treated them as such for all genetic analyses.
Nucleotide diversity in the mitochondrial and nuclear compartments of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
# of sites
# of Indelsg (length nt)
π × 10-3 (SD × 10-3)
θW × 10-3 (SD × 10-3
πsyn × 10-3
πns × 10-3
Tajima's D test (P value)
-0.49 (> 0.10)
-0.38 (> 0.10)
structural RNA genesc
-0.55 (> 0.10)
-0.35 (> 0.10)
-0.48 (> 0.10)
-0.16 (> 0.10)
-0.48 (> 0.10)
Exonic (by gene)
-1.00 (> 0.10)
-0.27 (> 0.10)
1.10 (> 0.10)
0.27 (> 0.10)
-1.59 (> 0.10)
Intronic (by gene)
0.26 (> 0.10)
0.39 (> 0.10)
0.20 (> 0.10)
-0.07 (> 0.10)
-0.61 (> 0.10)
-0.38 (> 0.10)
0.01 (> 0.10)
Insertions and deletions
For both the nuclear and mitochondrial compartments, insertions and deletions (indels) represent a large proportion of the observed polymorphisms (Table 2). In our alignments of the nuclear loci from the 7 different strains of C. reinhardtii, 36% of mismatched nucleotides result from indels. The nuclear indels range from 1–31 nucleotides (nt) in length and have an average size of 4.5 nt. In the mitochondrial compartment indels represent 20% of the mismatched nucleotides. The mitochondrial indels range from 1–6 nt in length and have an average size of 2.5 nt. It is important to note that our estimates of nucleotide diversity shown in Table 2 are derived from sites in the alignment where all seven strains of C. reinhardtii have a nucleotide; therefore, sites corresponding to indels were removed from the alignment. If our methods for calculating π are modified to include indels (by counting each gap in the alignment as a nucleotide change) the overall values of πsilent in the nuclear and mitochondrial compartments become 49.27 × 10-3 (± 4.89 × 10-3) and 10.93 × 10-3 (± 1.96 × 10-3), respectively.
Testing for neutrality
McDonald-Kreitman test comparing the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous differences within Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to that found between C. reinhardtii and Chlamydomonas incerta.
Polymorphisms within C. reinhardtii
Substitutions between C. reinhardtii and C. incerta
Accounting for the differences in πsilent
Before we interpret our data on nucleotide diversity in relation to the mutational-burden hypothesis, let us first try to account for the values of πsilent that we observed. Overall, in C. reinhardtii we found 3.7-fold more nucleotide diversity at silent sites in the nuclear compartment than in the mitochondrial compartment; and when indels are taken into consideration, πsilent appears to be 4.5 times greater in the nuclear DNA compared to the mtDNA. Assuming that πsilent is equal to 2N g μ, we can discuss our findings on nucleotide diversity in relation to μ and N g .
In a recent study that compared silent-site substitution rates in the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes between C. reinhardtii and C. incerta, it was concluded that the mutation rate in the nuclear compartment of these taxa is approximately the same as that in the mitochondrial compartment [6, 7]. If is similar in both the nuclear DNA and mtDNA of C. reinhardtii, then it appears that differences in N g would have to explain the disparity in nucleotide diversity that we observe between these genomes.
In order to arrive at the values of πsilent observed in this study, N g would have to be higher for the nuclear genome than for the mitochondrial genome (again, assuming equal mutation rates); there are a few reasons why this might be the case. For the haploid alga C. reinhardtii, nuclear genes are inherited biparentally and mitochondrial genes are inherited uniparentally . As mentioned earlier, this is thought to reduce N g in the mitochondrial compartment by approximately one-half relative to that in the nucleus . Thus, for C. reinhardtii we might expect a value of πsilent in the mitochondrial compartment to be around one-half of what is observed in the nuclear compartment. Uniparental inheritance also implies that the mtDNA of C. reinhardtii has less opportunity for recombination than the nuclear DNA, which may make the mitochondrial genome as a whole more susceptible to the effects of selective sweeps and purifying selection, both of which can reduce N g , resulting in an even smaller than expected value of πsilent in the mitochondrial compartment [29, 30]. One way to detect the influences of selection is with the McDonald-Kreitman test, where positive selection is inferred if the test returns a value for the neutrality index (NI) < 1, and purifying selection is indicated by NI > 1 [29–31]. Although the results of the MacDonald-Kreitman test for C. reinhardtii versus C. incerta showed no significant departure from neutral expectations, values of NI were < 1 for rtl and the concatenated sequence of the standard mitochondrial protein-coding regions (Table 3), which might be an indication of positive selection. Moreover, Tajima's D test returned negative values for all of the mtDNA regions that were examined (Table 2) – negative values of Tajima's D test can be an indication of a recent selective sweep of a linked mutation  – but again these findings were not statistically significant.
A further consideration is that the mutation rate in the C. reinhardtii mitochondrial compartment may be slightly lower than that in the nuclear compartment. When Popescu and Lee  estimated μ to be similar for both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of C. reinhardtii, they used the synonymous substitution rate in rtl (which was about double that of the standard mitochondrial protein-coding regions) as an estimate of the neutral mutation rate in the mitochondrial compartment. In contrast, we found πsyn in rtl to be similar to that of the standard mitochondrial protein-coding regions (7.88 × 10-3 vs. 8.52 × 10-3), and although this could be an artefact of a small sample size, it might suggest that Popescu and Lee overestimated μ in the C. reinhardtii mtDNA.
Πsilent in relation to previous studies on C. reinhardtiiand other unicellular eukaryotes
Our estimates of πsilent in the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes of C. reinhardtii are approximately 32 × 10-3 and 8.5 × 10-3, respectively; and with indels factored in, these values become ~50 × 10-3 for the nuclear DNA and about 11 × 10-3 for the mtDNA. The only other estimates of nucleotide diversity in the C. reinhardtii nuclear and mitochondrial genomes that we could find were that of Lynch and Connery , who, using 11 kb of mostly noncoding nuclear DNA from C. reinhardtii strains MA-1 and MN, found πsilent in the nuclear compartment to be ~40 × 10-3 (they estimated N e μ to be ~20 × 10-3), which is in agreement with our observations. With respect to other green algae, we are unaware of any reported estimates of within-population silent-site variation in either nuclear or mitochondrial genomes.
There is an overall lack of data on πsilent for unicellular species; however, the data that are available are relatively consistent with our results for C. reinhardtii. Among unicellular fungi, average values of πsilent in the nuclear and mitochondrial compartments (based on data for 3 different species) were estimated to be 50 × 10-3 and 12 × 10-3, respectively [1, 3], which is comparable to what we observed in C. reinhardtii. Furthermore, the genera Paramecium and Trypanosoma appear to have ratios of πsilent(mitochondrion)/πsilent(nucleus) of approximately 0.4 , which is within the range of our estimates for C. reinhardtii (0.2–0.25). All studies deriving measures of πsilent from the mitochondrial genome of unicellular eukaryotes have used 3 or fewer loci for their estimates and have tended to focus only on synonymous sites, which makes our analysis one of the most comprehensive for any mitochondrial genome from a unicellular eukaryote to date.
It is also of interest to compare the nucleotide diversity of C. reinhardtii to that of multicellular species. Our estimation of nucleotide diversity in the nuclear genome of C. reinhardtii is much greater than that observed for animals: ~9 times larger than the average estimate for mammals (3.6 × 10-3), and 2 times greater than the average for invertebrates, which is believed to be < 14.8 × 10-3 . Our approximation of πsilent for the mitochondrial genome of C. reinhardtii is much smaller than that of animals: 0.2 times the average for mammals (40 × 10-3) and 0.1–0.6 times the average for invertebrates (11 × 10-3– 67 × 10-3) . In comparison to land plants, C. reinhardtii has twice the amount of silent-site nucleotide variation in its nuclear genome (πsilent in land plants is estimated to be ~15 × 10–3), and although we are unaware of any reliable assessments of πsilent in land plant mtDNA, it is purported to be < 0.4 × 10-3 , which is less than 0.05 times what we observed for the C. reinhardtii mtDNA.
Testing the mutational-burden hypothesis
At first glance, our estimates of nucleotide diversity in the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes of C. reinhardtii appear contrary to what would be expected under the mutational-burden hypothesis. We found πsilent to be ~4 times greater in the nuclear compartment than in the mitochondrial compartment, but based on the streamlined nature of the C. reinhardtii mitochondrial genome in relation to its noncompact nuclear genome, one might expect the mutational-burden hypothesis to predict a greater value of πsilent for the mtDNA. However, before we conclude that our findings are in opposition to the mutation-burden hypothesis, we must first consider what the actual "encumbrance" of noncoding DNA is for the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes in C. reinhardtii.
As described earlier, the basic premise of the mutation-burden hypothesis is that noncoding DNA magnifies the target site for deleterious mutations, thereby, increasing the susceptibility of a genome to degenerative changes. The mutational disadvantage of noncoding DNA, therefore, is critically dependent on: 1) the number of nucleotides that are associated with gene function (n), and 2) the per-nucleotide mutation rate (μ). These two terms can be combined to define the overall mutational disadvantage (s), where s = nμ [3, 33]. It is predicted that the threshold in a genome below which noncoding DNA can proliferate is 2N g s < 1, or alternatively 2N g μ < 1/n [3, 33]. Although it is difficult to estimate n for intergenic regions, values of n for intronic regions can be predicted with reasonable confidence. For the spliceosomal introns of eukaryotic genomes, n is believed to be around 25 , which gives a threshold for intron colonization in the nuclear compartment of 2N g μ < 0.04. Because mitochondrial introns are self-splicing and do not rely on a spliceosome for excision they have more nucleotides that are critical for proper splicing; thus, we can conservatively say that for mitochondrial introns n is between 75–100 (see  for a review on mitochondrial-intron folding), giving a threshold for intron proliferation in the mitochondrial compartment of ~2N g μ < 0.01. Based on the mutational-burden hypothesis, our estimates of 2N g μ (i.e. πsilent) in the nuclear and mitochondrial compartments of C. reinhardtii, whether including or excluding the influence of indels, lie too close to the predicted thresholds for intron proliferation in these genomes to accurately forecast intron abundance.
We do not know what the encumbrance of intergenic regions is for either the nuclear or the mitochondrial genome of C. reinhardtii, but if it is (or was at some point in the past) substantially higher for the mtDNA than the nuclear DNA, it would indicate that the mitochondrial compartment is a less permissive environment for the proliferation of intergenic DNA. And although this is highly speculative, there is one reason why this might be the case. In the C. reinhardtii mitochondrial genome, mature-RNA transcripts are generated by precise endonucleolytic cleavage of long polycistronic precursor-messenger RNAs; it is believed that these immature transcripts are cleaved in regions of the RNA corresponding to intergenic sites in the mitochondrial genome, and that processing is critically dependent on the primary sequence and the secondary structure of these regions . This implies that the intergenic sites in the C. reinhardtii mitochondrial genome may have a large mutational burden associated with them, perhaps large enough to impose a barrier on the amplitude of intergenic mtDNA. Moreover, the polycistronic nature of the C. reinhardtii mitochondrial transcripts suggest that the regulatory elements within the intergenic mtDNA carry the increased burden of being responsible for many genes – a burden not typically associated with the monocystronic gene regulation of nuclear DNA .
If the burden of intronic and intergenic DNA is higher in the mtDNA of green algae and other protists, then we might expect to find very low values of πsilent in the mitochondrial genomes of species from these groups that have an abundance of intronic and intergenic sequences – for examples see references [12, 36, 37].
It is worth noting that the C. reinhardtii chloroplast genome when compared to its mitochondrial counterpart has a similarly low density of introns but a substantially greater proportion of intergenic DNA . Using 1500 nt of chloroplast DNA (composed of the petA gene and a single intergenic region) we found no nucleotide polymorphisms in any of the 7 geographical isolates of C. reinhardtii employed in this study (our unpublished data). For a genome rich in intergenic DNA this value is consistent with what one might expect under the mutational-burden hypothesis.
Novel mitochondrial introns
An unforeseen consequence of this study is the discovery of 4 previously unreported C. reinhardtii mitochondrial introns, two of which (the L5- and L7-introns) are unusual. Although a detailed description of these introns is beyond the scope of this paper, they each contain a characteristic that is notable: 1) the L5-intron carries a 35 nt portion of the L5-rRNA-coding module within the 5 -end of its DNA sequence – this is an unprecedented feature for a mitochondrial intron. And 2) the insertion site of the L7-intron in relation to the C. reinhardtii LSU-rRNA secondary-structure model of Boer and Gray  corresponds to domain III (Figure 3); we believe this to be the first example (for any taxon) of an intron found in domain III of the LSU rRNA.
The discovery of 4 new optional introns in the C. reinhardtii mtDNA does not alter the notion that in C. reinhardtii the mitochondrial compartment is significantly more compact than the nuclear compartment: the mitochondrial genome of C. reinhardtii PA-1, the isolate with the most introns, is still ~67% coding compared to < 20% for the nuclear genome.
The main objective of this study was to investigate genome compactness from a population-genetic perspective and, in doing so, test a contemporary hypothesis regarding the origins of genome architecture – the mutational-burden hypothesis. Our findings may not appear to be in full agreement with the mutational-burden hypothesis, we found ~4 times more nucleotide diversity in the nuclear compartment of C. reinhardtii relative to the mitochondrial compartment. However, when the 2N g μ-threshold for the proliferation of intronic and intergenic DNA is considered, we conclude that introns impose a greater burden on C. reinhardtii mtDNA and suggest that the intergenic regions of this genome do so as well. Overall, we cannot reject the mutational-burden hypothesis.
Strains, culture conditions, and DNA and RNA extractions
All of the C. reinhardtii strains employed in this study were obtained from the Chlamydomonas Center at Duke University in July of 2006, with the exception to C. reinhardtii CC-277, which was obtained from the same source in 1991. Clonal cultures of each strain were prepared from a single vegetative colony recovered on agar medium . For each of the seven strains, total genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD), and total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen).
To verify that the 7 C. reinhardtii isolates had been assigned the correct strain numbers we compared our sequences of the ypt4-VI, ypt4-VII, and act-VIII introns for each isolate to those obtained in other studies [16–18] from the corresponding isolates. The results confirmed that the 7 C. reinhardtii isolates employed here are the same as those used in previous reports.
Amplification and sequencing of genetic loci
A PCR-based approach was used to amplify the mtDNA and the nuclear loci examined in this study. PCR experiments were performed in High Fidelity Platinum SuperMix (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using total genomic DNA as the template. Reverse-transcriptase (RT) PCR reactions were performed with the SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR System (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's protocol. PCR and RT-PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). The purified products were sequenced on both strands at the Macrogen sequencing facility, Rockville, MD, USA.
C. reinhardtiistrain CC-503
The complete mitochondrial genome of C. reinhardtii strain CC-503 (cw92 mt+) was obtained by collecting and assembling mtDNA sequences generated from the C. reinhardtii nuclear genome sequencing project . These sequences were acquired by blasting the complete C. reinhardtii mitochondrial genome against the following databases at the United States Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (DOE JGI): C. reinhardtii v3.1-unplaced reads and C. reinhardtii v3.1-bonus scaffolds. Blast hits showing > 99% similarity to C. reinhardtii mtDNA were downloaded and assembled. All mitochondrial hits were subsequently checked against the draft nuclear genome of C. reinhardtii (v3.0 unmasked assembly) to insure that no nuclear mitochondrial DNA sequences (NUMTs) were collected. Our assembly of the downloaded mtDNA sequences contains over 500 chromatogram reads and gives a complete C. reinhardtii CC-503 mitochondrial genome with 15-fold coverage.
To ensure that the 7 nuclear-encoded genes employed in this study are present only once in the C. reinhardtii nuclear genome we blasted each of the 7 sequences against the C. reinhardtii draft nuclear genome . All 7 genes returned a single hit, which is consistent with the hypothesis that these genes are present in single copies in the C. reinhardtii nuclear genome. The mitochondrial sequences obtained from each of the seven strains were also blasted against the C. reinhardtii draft nuclear genome to confirm that they are not NUMTs: the blast results suggest that there are very few copies of mitochondrial sequences in the nuclear compartment and the few that are present are highly degenerate; therefore, we are confident that none of the mtDNA sequences presented in this study are NUMTs. The mitochondrial introns of cox1 and their secondary structures were identified using RNAweasel . DnaSP 4.0  was used for calculating all measures of genetic diversity. Nucleotide diversity and its standard deviation were calculated using equation 10.6 and 10.3 of Nei , respectively. Theta was calculated using equation 3 of Tajima . The MacDonald-Kreitman test  and Tajima's D test  were performed in DnaSP.
Genbank accession numbers of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii sequences employed in this study.
We thankfully acknowledge Joseph Bielawski and Joel Malek for helpful comments as well as Sean Farmer and Tudor Borza who carried out preliminary analyses at the inception of this study. This work was supported by a grant to RWL from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. DRS received a Canada Graduate Scholarship from NSERC.
- Lynch M, Conery JS: The origins of genome complexity. Science. 2003, 302: 1401-1404. 10.1126/science.1089370.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynch M: Streamlining and simplification of microbial genome architecture. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006, 60: 327-349. 10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynch M, Koskella B, Schaack S: Mutation pressure and the evolution of organelle genomic architecture. Science. 2006, 311: 1727-1730. 10.1126/science.1118884.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynch M: The Origins of Genome Architecture. 2007, Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, IncGoogle Scholar
- Birky CW, Fuerst P, Maryama T: Organelle gene diversity under migration, mutation, and drift: equilibrium expectations, approach to equilibrium, effect of heteroplasmic cells, and comparison to nuclear genes. Genetics. 1989, 121: 613-627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Popescu CE, Borza T, Bielawski JP, Lee RW: Evolutionary rates and expression level in Chlamydomonas. Genetics. 2006, 172: 1567-1576. 10.1534/genetics.105.047399.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Popescu CE, Lee RW: Mitochondrial genome sequence evolution in Chlamydomonas. Genetics. 2007, 175: 819-826. 10.1534/genetics.106.063156.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merchant SS, Prochnik SE, Vallon O, (117 co-authors), et al: The Chlamydomonas genome reveals the evolution of key animal and plant functions. Science. 2007, 318: 245-250. 10.1126/science.1143609.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gray MW, Boer PH: Organization and expression of algal (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii) mitochondrial DNA. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988, 319: 135-147. 10.1098/rstb.1988.0038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michaelis G, Vahrenholz C, Pratje E: Mitochondrial DNA of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: the gene for apocytochrome b and the complete functional map of the 15.8 kb DNA. Mol Gen Genet. 1990, 223: 211-216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vahrenholz C, Riemen G, Pratje E, Dujon B, Michaelis G: Mitochondrial DNA of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: the structure of the ends of the linear 15.8-kb genome suggests mechanisms for DNA replication. Curr Genet. 1993, 24: 241-247. 10.1007/BF00351798.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pombert JF, Beauchamp P, Otis C, Lemieux C, Turmel M: The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the green alga Oltmannsiellopsis viridis: evolutionary trends of the mitochondrial genome in the Ulvophyceae. Curr Genet. 2006, 50: 137-147. 10.1007/s00294-006-0076-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Colleaux L, Michel-Wolwertz MR, Matagne RF, Dujon B: The apocytochrome b gene of Chlamydomonas smithii contains a mobile intron related to both Saccharomyces and Neurospora introns. Mol Gen Genet. 1990, 223: 288-296. 10.1007/BF00265065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boynton JE, Harris EH, Burkhart BD, Lamerson PM, Gillham NW: Transmission of mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes in crosses of Chlamydomonas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987, 84: 2391-2395. 10.1073/pnas.84.8.2391.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boer PH, Gray MW: Genes encoding a subunit of respiratory NADH dehydrogenase (ND1) and a reverse transcriptase-like protein (RTL) are linked to ribosomal RNA pieces in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mitochondrial DNA. EMBO J. 1988, 7: 3501-3508.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dietmaier W, Fabry S, Huber H, Schmitt R: Analysis of a family of ypt genes and their products from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Gene. 1995, 158: 41-50. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00052-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sugase Y, Hirono M, Kindle KL, Kamiya R: Cloning and characterization of the actin-encoding gene of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Gene. 1995, 168: 117-121. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00711-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liss M, Kirk DL, Beyser K, Fabry S: Intron sequences provide a tool for high-resolution phylogenetic analysis of volvocine algae. Curr Genet. 1997, 31: 214-227. 10.1007/s002940050198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- JGI Chlamydomonas reinhardtii v3.0. [http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Chlre3/Chlre3.home.html]
- Harris EH: The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook. 1989, San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
- Boer PH, Gray MW: Scrambled ribosomal RNA gene pieces in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mitochondrial DNA. Cell. 1988, 55: 399-411. 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90026-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Denovan-Wright EM, Lee RW: Comparative structure and genomic organization of the discontinuous mitochondrial ribosomal RNA genes of Chlamydomonas eugametos and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Mol Biol. 1994, 241: 298-311. 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fan J, Schnare MN, Lee RW: Characterization of fragmented mitochondrial ribosomal RNAs of the colorless green alga Polytomella parva. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 769-778. 10.1093/nar/gkg144.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tajima F: Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989, 123: 585-595.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watterson GA: On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Pop Biol. 1975, 7: 256-276. 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McDonald JH, Kreitman M: Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature. 1991, 351: 652-654. 10.1038/351652a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pröschold T, Harris EH, Coleman A: Portrait of a species: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics. 2005, 170: 1601-1610. 10.1534/genetics.105.044503.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris EH: Chlamydomonas as a model organism. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2001, 52: 160-174. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.363.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bazin E, Glémin S, Galtier N: Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals. Science. 2006, 312: 570-572. 10.1126/science.1122033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meiklejohn CD, Montooth KL, Rand DM: Positive and negative selection on the mitochondrial genome. Trends Genet. 2007, 23: 259-263. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.03.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rand DM, Kann LM: Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Genetica. 1998, 103: 393-407. 10.1023/A:1017006118852.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tajima F: Measurement of DNA polymorphisms. Mechanisms of Molecular Evolution. Edited by: Takahat N and Clark AG. 1993, Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc, 37-59.Google Scholar
- Lynch M: Intron evolution as a population-genetic process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 6118-6123. 10.1073/pnas.092595699.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lang BF, Laforest MJ, Burger G: Mitochondrial introns: a critical view. Trends Genet. 2007, 23: 119-125. 10.1016/j.tig.2007.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gurley WB, O'Grady K, Czarnecka-Verner E, Lawit SI: General transcription factors and the core promoter: ancient roots. Regulation of Transcription in Plants. Edited by: Grasser KD. 2006, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd, 1-21.Google Scholar
- Turmel M, Otis C, Lemieux C: An unexpectedly large and loosely packed mitochondrial genome in the charophycean green alga Chlorokybus atmophyticus. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 137-10.1186/1471-2164-8-137.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Forget L, Ustinova J, Wang Z, Huss VA, Lang BF: Hyaloraphidium curvatum: a linear mitochondrial genome, tRNA editing, and an evolutionary link to lower fungi. Mol Biol Evol. 2002, 19: 310-319.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maul JE, Lilly JW, Cui L, dePamphilis CW, Miller W, Harris EH, Stern DB: The Chlamydomonas reinhardtii plastid chromosome: islands of genes in a sea of repeats. Plant Cell. 2002, 14: 2659-2679. 10.1105/tpc.006155.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R: DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 2496-2497. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nei M: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. 1987, New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
- Hoshaw RW, Ettl H: Chlamydomonas smithii sp. nov.: a chlamydomonad interfertile with Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Phycol. 1966, 2: 93-96. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.1966.tb04600.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gross CH, Ranum LPW, Lefebvre PA: Extensive restriction fragment length polymorphisms in a new isolate of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Curr Genet. 1988, 13: 503-508. 10.1007/BF02427756.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spanier JG, Graham JE, Jarvik JW: Isolation and preliminary characterization of three Chlaymydomonas strains interfertile with Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Chlorophyta). J Phycol. 1992, 28: 822-828. 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1992.00822.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cannone JJ, Subramanian S, Schnare MN, Collett JR, D'Souza LM, Du Y, Feng B, Lin N, Madabusi LV, Müller KM, Pande N, Shang Z, Yu N, Gutell RR: The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BMC Bioinformatics. 2002, 3: 15-10.1186/1471-2105-3-15.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.