Skip to main content

Table 1 Z-scores of the robustness γ 1 m MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaacciGae83SdC2aa0baaSqaaiabigdaXaqaaiabd2gaTbaaaaa@3001@ at threshold level T1. Rates for each real pre-miRNA compared to 1,000 random and four types of shuffled sequences.

From: In silico genetic robustness analysis of microRNA secondary structures: potential evidence of congruent evolution in microRNA

Species

Random

Zero-markov

Mononucleotide

First-markov

Dinucleotide

H. sapiens

-2.39 ± 0.64

-2.42 ± 0.63

-2.42 ± 0.63

-2.45 ± 0.63

-2.44 ± 0.64

C. elegans

-2.50 ± 0.92

-2.48 ± 0.89

-2.47 ± 0.89

-2.52 ± 0.90

-2.49 ± 0.89

D. melanogaster

-2.44 ± 0.75

-2.39 ± 0.74

-2.39 ± 0.74

-2.43 ± 0.74

-2.40 ± 0.73

D. rerio

-2.39 ± 0.59

-2.40 ± 0.58

-2.40 ± 0.57

-2.44 ± 0.57

-2.41 ± 0.57

M. musculus

-2.23 ± 0.79

-2.25 ± 0.77

-2.26 ± 0.77

-2.29 ± 0.77

-2.27 ± 0.76

R. norvegicus

-2.32 ± 0.78

-2.37 ± 0.75

-2.37 ± 0.76

-2.40 ± 0.76

-2.37 ± 0.75

Average

-2.37 ± 0.71

-2.38 ± 0.69

-2.38 ± 0.69

-2.42 ± 0.70

-2.40 ± 0.69