Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of mip-1 introgressed lines.

From: The genetics of ray pattern variation in Caenorhabditis briggsae

 

p values for reciprocal chi-squared tests1

 

AF16

PB1060

PB1061

PB1062

PB1065

ray pattern2

     

AF16

---

9.6 × 10-30

3.3 × 10-54

6.5 × 10-32

5.3 × 10-46

PB1060

7.9 × 10-4

---

0.031

0.093

1.2 × 10-5

PB1061

2.2 × 10-7

0.026

---

0.367

0.011

PB1062

2.8 × 10-6

0.092

0.293

---

0.091

PB1065

2.3 × 10-9

1.3 × 10-4

0.038

0.151

---

ray position3

     

AF16

---

6.9 × 10-4

1.5 × 10-5

3.6 × 10-4

3.2 × 10-4

PB1060

1.32 × 10-29

---

0.068

0.72

0.67

PB1061

6.4 × 10-53

0.053

---

0.12

0.14

PB1062

8.3 × 10-30

0.73

0.16

---

0.95

PB1065

1.65 × 10-36

0.66

0.14

0.95

---

ray fusion4

     

AF16

---

0.13

5.3 × 10-3

3.1 × 10-3

9.8 × 10-6

PB1060

0.013

---

0.061

0.033

3.1 × 10-5

PB1061

4.74 × 10-6

0.057

---

0.80

0.029

PB1062

9.37 × 10-7

0.030

0.80

---

0.052

PB1065

1.33 × 10-16

1.59 × 10-6

0.013

0.028

---

  1. 1 Probabilities in each column were determined using frequencies of different ray patterns in each strain (column head) as the null hypothesis.
  2. 2 p values for the complete ray pattern (3 posterior and fused, 3 posterior not fused, 3 anterior).
  3. 3 p values for ray placement (anterior vs posterior).
  4. 4 p values for fusion of rays 3 and 4 when ray 3 is in a posterior position.