Table 4 Comparison of partitioning strategies
Strategy | #part | Specification | lnL | lnBF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
P1 | 1 | unpartitioned dataset | -8258.76 | 831 |
P2 | 2 | partitioned according to mitochondrial (CO1 and NADH1) and nulclear (28S) gene identity | -7979.18 | 552 |
P3a | 3 | 28S unpartitioned, mitochondrial markers partitioned into first and second versus third codon position | -7732.43 | 305 |
P3b | 3 | partitioned according to gene identity (CO1, NADH1 and 28S) | -7963.23 | 536 |
P5 | 5 | 28S unpartitioned, mitochondrial markers separately partitioned into first and second versus third codon position | -7563.92 | 137 |
P6 | 6 | mitochondrial genes partitioned as under P5 and 28S partitioned into stem and loop | -7574.96 | 148 |
P6* | 6 | as P6, but with doublet model for the pairing stem partition of 28S | -7427.27 | - |