From: Looking for trees in the forest: summary tree from posterior samples
Method | TIMES | CME | CCE | MODEL | POLY | MF% | CAE% | CME% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT,TCB | 1 | 1 | 14 | 19 | 0.0% | 45.2% | 3.79% | 36.33% |
CAT,MCC | 2 | 4 | 15 | 18 | 0.0% | 45.3% | 3.79% | 36.46% |
TP (avg) | 5 | 0 | 13 | 11 | 0.0% | 93.2% | 4.37% | 36.22% |
TP (med) | 12 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 0.0% | 98.6% | 4.50% | 36.21% |
SRBS,TCB | 6 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 4.1% | 91.8% | 4.38% | 36.64% |
MED,TCB | 7 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 1.1% | 94.0% | 4.36% | 36.36% |
HSO,TCB | 8 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 1.1% | 94.0% | 4.36% | 36.35% |
MED,MCC | 9 | 6 | 13 | 6 | 0.9% | 94.6% | 4.37% | 36.48% |
mSRBS | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 3.8% | 92.1% | 4.39% | 36.80% |
HSO,MCC | 10 | 5 | 14 | 7 | 0.9% | 94.6% | 4.37% | 36.48% |
AVG,MCC | 10 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 1.1% | 84.2% | 4.30% | 36.49% |
SRBS,MCC | 11 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 4.2% | 91.9% | 4.39% | 36.8% |
mHS | 0 | 19 | 1 | 16 | 29.8% | 50.0% | 3.97% | 44.48% |
HS,MCC | 3 | 19 | 2 | 14 | 34.3% | 54.9% | 4.16% | 44.27% |
HS,TCB | 4 | 18 | 2 | 15 | 34.5% | 54.6% | 4.18% | 44.09% |
CONS (med) | 6 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 27.5% | 46.3% | 3.98% | 43.00% |
RAS,MCC | 13 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 24.4% | 93.1% | 4.66% | 42.45% |
RAS,TCB | 14 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 24.2% | 92.7% | 4.67% | 42.26% |
mRAS | 15 | 16 | 6 | 5 | 24.5% | 88.2% | 4.74% | 42.73% |
RBS,TCB | 16 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 23.4% | 99.0% | 4.82% | 40.60% |
mRBS | 17 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 23.8% | 99.1% | 4.84% | 40.80% |
RBS,MCC | 18 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 23.7% | 99.0% | 4.81% | 40.94% |