Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of findings

From: Phenotypic plasticity in opsin expression in a butterfly compound eye complements sex role reversal

Experiment

Groups compared†

p-value‡

Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC)

PCC result or group with greater mean, if significant

Unadjusted eye size

M vs. F

<0.001***

 

M

WS vs. DS

<0.001***

 

WS

Forewing area

M vs. F

<0.001***

 

F

WS vs. DS

<0.001***

 

DS

Adjusted eye size (corrected with forewing area)

M vs. F

<0.001***

 

M

WS vs. DS

<0.001***

 

WS

Correlation between eye size and wing size

WSM

0.001**

r=0.658

Linear relationship

WSF

0.002**

r=0.588

Linear relationship

DSM

0.149

r=0.253

 

DSF

0.006**

r=0.523

Linear relationship

Both sexes, both seasons

<0.001***

r=−0.354

Linear relationship

Facet lens area

M vs. F

<0.001***

 

M

WS vs. DS

0.031*

 

DS

Facet number

WSM

0.937

r=−0.031

 

WSF

0.862

r=0.063

 

DSM

0.472

r=−0.176

 

DSF

0.536

r=0.223

 

Both sexes, both seasons

0.250

r=0.169

 

M vs. F

<0.001***

 

M

WS vs. DS

<0.001***

 

WS

UV opsin expression

DSM vs. DSF

0.051

 

DSM (not significant)

WSM vs. WSF

0.111

  

DSM vs. WSM

0.799

  

DSF vs. WSF

0.010*

 

WSF

Blue opsin expression

DSM vs. DSF

0.006**

 

DSM

WSM vs. WSF

0.333

  

DSM vs. WSM

0.757

  

DSF vs. WSF

0.007**

 

WSF

LW opsin expression

DSM vs. DSF

0.005**

 

DSM

WSM vs. WSF

0.454

  

DSM vs. WSM

0.329

  
 

DSF vs. WSF

0.007**

 

WSF

  1. † M, male; F, female; DS, dry season; WS, wet season; DSM, dry season male; WSM, wet season male; etc. ‡ Not significant, p>0.05; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.