Skip to main content

Table 6 Statistical comparisons among 15 alternative tree topologies of the four more derived suborders using AU test

From: Evolutionary history of anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes): a mitogenomic perspective

Treea

Diff -ln L

P

(Og,(An,(Ch,Ce))) b

0.0

0.589

((Og,An)(Ch,Ce)) c

0.0

0.577

(An,(Og,(Ch,Ce)))

0.5

0.520

(Og,(Ce,(An,Ch)))

22.4

0.030

(Og,(Ch,(An,Ce)))

27.5

0.006

(An,(Ce,(Ch,Og)))

42.5

0.015

(An,(Ch,(Og,Ce))) d

43.8

0.002

((An,Ch)(Og,Ce))

47.9

0.000

(Ce,(Og,(An,Ch)))

48.9

0.000

((An,Ce)(Ch,Og))

49.7

0.002

(Ch,(Og,(An,Ce)))

50.4

0.000

(Ch,(Ce,(An,Og)))

53.2

0.004

(Ce,(Ch,(An,Og)))

54.2

0.008

(Ce,(An,(Og,Ch)))

54.6

0.000

(Ch,(An,(Og,Ce)))

55.1

0.002

  1. a Ogcocephaloidei (Og); Antennarioidei (An); Chaunacoidei (Ch); Ceratioidei (Ce). The most basal Lophioidei was excluded from the comparisons
  2. b The best-scoring ML tree derived from 12n3rRTn (Figure 5) and 12nRTn datasets.
  3. c The best-scoring ML tree derived from 123nRTn dataset.
  4. d Morphology-based hypothesis [3]